SIU Director’s Report - Case # 20-TVI-084

Warning:

This page contains graphic content that can shock, offend and upset.

Mandate of the SIU

The Special Investigations Unit is a civilian law enforcement agency that investigates incidents involving police officers where there has been death, serious injury or allegations of sexual assault. The Unit’s jurisdiction covers more than 50 municipal, regional and provincial police services across Ontario.

Under the Police Services Act, the Director of the SIU must determine based on the evidence gathered in an investigation whether an officer has committed a criminal offence in connection with the incident under investigation. If, after an investigation, there are reasonable grounds to believe that an offence was committed, the Director has the authority to lay a criminal charge against the officer. Alternatively, in all cases where no reasonable grounds exist, the Director does not lay criminal charges but files a report with the Attorney General communicating the results of an investigation.

Information Restrictions

Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (“FIPPA”)

Pursuant to section 14 of FIPPA (i.e., law enforcement), certain information may not be included in this report. This information may include, but is not limited to, the following:
  • Confidential investigative techniques and procedures used by law enforcement agencies; and
  • Information whose release could reasonably be expected to interfere with a law enforcement matter or an investigation undertaken with a view to a law enforcement proceeding. 
Pursuant to section 21 of FIPPA (i.e., personal privacy), protected personal information is not included in this document. This information may include, but is not limited to, the following:
  • Subject Officer name(s);
  • Witness Officer name(s);
  • Civilian Witness name(s);
  • Location information; 
  • Witness statements and evidence gathered in the course of the investigation provided to the SIU in confidence; and 
  • Other identifiers which are likely to reveal personal information about individuals involved in the investigation.


Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004 (“PHIPA”)

Pursuant to PHIPA, any information related to the personal health of identifiable individuals is not included.

Other proceedings, processes, and investigations

Information may have also been excluded from this report because its release could undermine the integrity of other proceedings involving the same incident, such as criminal proceedings, coroner’s inquests, other public proceedings and/or other law enforcement investigations.

Mandate Engaged

The Unit’s investigative jurisdiction is limited to those incidents where there is a serious injury (including sexual assault allegations) or death in cases involving the police.

“Serious injuries” shall include those that are likely to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim and are more than merely transient or trifling in nature and will include serious injury resulting from sexual assault. “Serious Injury” shall initially be presumed when the victim is admitted to hospital, suffers a fracture to a limb, rib or vertebrae or to the skull, suffers burns to a major portion of the body or loses any portion of the body or suffers loss of vision or hearing, or alleges sexual assault. Where a prolonged delay is likely before the seriousness of the injury can be assessed, the Unit should be notified so that it can monitor the situation and decide on the extent of its involvement.

This report relates to the SIU’s investigation into a serious injury sustained by a 63-year-old man (the “Complainant”).

The Investigation

Notification of the SIU

On April 13, 2020, at about 1326 hours, the Toronto Police Service (TPS) contacted the SIU with the following information. On April 13, 2020, at approximately 11:28 a.m., a marked TPS scout car driven by the Subject Officer (SO) was westbound on Shepperd Avenue approaching Allen Road with its emergency lights activated. The scout car entered the intersection against a red light and collided with a southbound Tesla driven by the Complainant. The Complainant suffered a broken leg and was transported by Emergency Medical Services to the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. The SO suffered unknown injuries and his passenger, Witness Officer (WO) #1, had some internal injuries. The injured parties were transported to the Humber River Hospital. 

The Team

Number of SIU Investigators assigned: 4
Number of SIU Forensic Investigators assigned: 2
Number of SIU Collision Reconstructionist assigned: 1

The SIU forensic investigators completed a scene examination, took photographs, and measured the scene with a Total Station device for forensic mapping purposes.

Complainant:

63-year-old male, declined to provide a statement


Civilian Witnesses

CW Not interviewed (Next-of-kin)

Witness Officers

WO #1 Interviewed
WO #2 Interviewed
WO #3 Interviewed
WO #4 Interviewed


Subject Officers

SO Interviewed, and notes received and reviewed


Evidence

The Scene

On April 13, 2020, at 3:52 p.m., a SIU forensic investigator arrived at the scene of the incident at Sheppard Avenue West and Allen Road in Toronto. At that time there was a grey Tesla on Sheppard Avenue West west of Allen Road with severe front-end damage. There were scrape marks in the intersection leading to the position of the Tesla. The SO’s TPS vehicle, a Ford Explorer, was on the grass on the southwest corner of the intersection with severe damage to the passenger side front door area. There were scrape marks and tire marks from the intersection to the position of the Explorer. The following scene diagram was completed.

Scene Diagram

Scene diagram

Expert Evidence


SIU Reconstruction Report


The scene, at the intersection of Allen Road and Sheppard Avenue, was examined on April 13, 2020, at approximately 3:45 p.m., just over four hours after the collision occurred. Both the Tesla and the TPS cruiser were at their final rest positions. The Tesla was located in the eastbound lanes west of the intersection facing north. The TPS cruiser, a marked 2018 Ford Explorer, was located on the grass southwest of the intersection facing roughly west.

Allen Road is a large urban arterial road that runs nominally north-south. Sheppard Avenue is a large urban arterial road that runs nominally east-west. The intersection of the two roads was not perpendicular but was slightly skewed, meaning they intersected at an angle of about 83 degrees. The intersection was controlled by traffic signals.

The Tesla and the TPS cruiser were examined by the SIU Reconstructionist while at the scene. The Tesla was identified as a grey 2019 Tesla 3 four door sedan. The Tesla sustained significant front-end damage across the entire width of the vehicle. The Tesla was equipped with an Event Data Recorder (EDR) which was downloaded on April 20, 2020.

Figure 1 - The Tesla driven by the Complainant.

Figure 1 - The Tesla driven by the Complainant.


The TPS cruiser was identified as a marked 2018 Ford Explorer SUV. The Ford sustained significant lateral impact damage to the right side extending from the middle of the right rear passenger door to the right front corner. There was also damage noted to the right rear corner bumper. The Ford was equipped with an EDR which was downloaded on April 14, 2020.

Figure 2 - The marked TPS Ford Explorer driven by the SO.

Figure 2 - The marked TPS Ford Explorer driven by the SO.


The point of impact was determined using the physical evidence on the road and the video footage available. There was a diagonal scuff mark on the road that was likely created by the right front tire of the TPS cruiser at impact. Placing the vehicles at this location was consistent with the positioning seen in the video footage. In addition, it was clear that the Tesla driver swerved to the right just before impact. This was consistent with the information from the Tesla’s EDR.

Figure 3 - The scrape mark that is believed to have been made by the TPS cruiser’s tire upon impact.

Figure 3 - The scrape mark that is believed to have been made by the TPS cruiser’s tire upon impact.


The Tesla EDR recorded crash data and pre-crash data. The pre-crash data consisted of five seconds of speed, accelerator, braking, and steering data. The speed and accelerator data were recorded in 0.2 second increments, the braking data in 0.5 second increments, and the steering data in 0.1 second increments. The table below highlights these data. It is clear from this data that the Tesla driver was accelerating aggressively (100% throttle) from 5 seconds before impact to 2.6 seconds before impact. The driver then eased off the accelerator until 1.4 seconds before impact. At this point until impact there was no accelerator input. The Tesla 3 acceleration capability is much higher than most passenger vehicles, which explains the increase in speed from 53 km/h to 115 km/h in 3.6 seconds. The vehicle’s speed reduced to 100 km/h at time zero, which was the time of impact.

The Tesla EDR recorded crash data and pre-crash data.

The TPS cruiser’s EDR recorded crash data and pre-crash data. The pre-crash data consisted of five seconds of speed, accelerator, braking, and steering data. The speed and accelerator data were recorded in 0.5 second increments, while the steering data was recorded in 0.1 second increments. The data show that the driver was traveling about 8 km/h at 5 seconds before impact and slowed to 6 km/h at 4 seconds before impact. The driver then began to accelerate. At 3 seconds before impact the Ford was traveling 13 km/h. At 2 seconds before impact the Ford was traveling 26 km/h. The Ford continued to accelerate at full throttle up until just before impact, reaching a top speed of 52 km/h.

The TPS cruiser’s EDR recorded crash data and pre-crash data.

Video/Audio/Photographic Evidence


Global Positioning System (GPS) / Automatic Vehicle Locator (AVL) & In-car Camera System (ICCS) Data


An SIU investigator viewed the ICCS video recordings from the TPS vehicles operated by the SO, WO #2 and WO #4 when the motor vehicle collision under investigation occurred.

The SIU investigator also analyzed the GPS / AVL data as captured in the police vehicle operated by the SO.

ICCS and AVL data were provided to the SIU by the TPS for about five minutes leading up to the collision.

The speeds provided by the AVL were entirely consistent with the video seen on the ICCS.

GPS / AVL
  • It was the understanding of the SIU investigator that AVL data were collected from the police vehicles about every 125 metres when the vehicle was in motion, and about every five minutes when the vehicle was stationary. These parameters would be affected by sightlines to satellites;
  • TPS provided 50 GPS data points;
  • GPS latitude and longitude were copied and pasted into the program Google Earth Pro which displayed each GPS point on a map. Tools within Google Earth Pro were used for measurements and to view traffic controls and posted signs;
  • The SIU investigator analyzed 43 of the data points which were relevant to the SIU investigation of the SO’s operation of the police vehicle leading up to the motor vehicle collision;
  • The data points considered for the analysis commenced at about 11:22 a.m. and concluded at about 11:27 a.m. on April 13, 2020;
  • For the purpose of this report the lanes on Yonge Street and on Sheppard Avenue West were numbered from the centre of the road to the curb, beginning with one; and
  • For the purpose of this analysis all speeds, times, and distances were approximate.

ICCS Recordings
  • The SO and WO #1 were logged onto, and the SO was operating, a fully marked Ford SUV equipped with flashing emergency lights and a siren;
  • WO #2 and WO #4 were operating Ford Sedans, similarly equipped.

11:22 a.m.
  • Video commenced. The SO was in the parking lot of 32 Division;
  • Thirty seconds later audio commenced as the flashing emergency lights and siren were activated;
  • The SO exited the lot and travelled northbound on Ellerslie Avenue;
  • The roads were wet, and the sky was overcast. There did not appear to be a need for windshield wipers;
  • The SO turned right onto Churchill Avenue. He slowed but not did stop at a stop sign. No other traffic was affected;
  • The police radio communications were heard in the background;
  • The SO turned right onto Yonge Street on a green light and travelled southbound;
  • There was little traffic; and
  • A few pedestrians were observed.


Yonge Street at Empress Avenue/Park Home Avenue

  • The SO had a green traffic light at Empress Avenue/Park Home Avenue. He entered the intersection from the left turn lane having passed other traffic which was stopped in the southbound through lanes. He passed through the intersection with no other traffic affected.

11:23 a.m.

Yonge Street at Elmwood Avenue/North York Boulevard

  • The SO passed uneventfully through the traffic light-controlled intersection of Yonge Street and Elmwood Avenue/North York Boulevard, on a green traffic signal.

Yonge Street at Elmhurst Avenue

  • The SO faced a red light at this intersection. He stopped (or very close to a stop) in southbound lane one, then entered and passed through the intersection. No other traffic was affected;
  • As per the AVL, the SO travelled southbound on Yonge Street from Church Street to Sheppard Avenue West, a distance of about 1.4 kilometres, in about one minute and 19 seconds, for an average speed of 62 km/h, with a maximum recorded speed of 99 km/h south of Elmwood Avenue;
  • Yonge Street was straight, with the speed limit presumed to be 50 km/h;
  • The SO had his flashing emergency lights and siren activated the entire time while southbound on Yonge Street.

Yonge Street at Sheppard Avenue West

  • The SO turned right from the southbound left turn lane of Yonge Street onto Sheppard Avenue West;
  • From 11:23 to 11:26 a.m., the SO travelled westbound on Sheppard Avenue West to Allen Road. The distance was about 4.3 kilometres;
  • The SO travelled 4.3 kilometres in about two minutes and 44 seconds, for an average of 96 km/h;
  • The SO’s maximum recorded speed on Sheppard Avenue West was 123 km/h while passing Earl Bales Park;
  • 50 km/h speed limit signs were posted on Sheppard Avenue West;
  • The SO had his flashing emergency lights and siren activated the entire time while he travelled on Sheppard Avenue West;
  • There was light traffic on Sheppard Avenue West. No traffic was seen to be adversely affected by the SO’s police vehicle;
  • The majority of civilian vehicles were properly pulling to the right for the approaching police vehicle(s);
  • Sheppard Avenue West was straight and appeared to be wet or at least damp;
  • The SO passed through the traffic light controlled intersections of Sheppard Avenue West at Beecroft Road, Senlac Road, Brentwood Avenue/Easton Road, Bathurst Street, Bryant Street/Yeomans Road, Goddard Street, Wilmington Avenue, Wilson Heights Boulevard, and the entrance/exit at the Sheppard West transit station prior to reaching Allen Road;

Sheppard Avenue West at Beecroft Road

  • As per the ICCS, the traffic light was green for the SO;
  • As per the AVL, the SO travelled at 80 km/h just prior to the intersection and 104 km/h just after the intersection.

11:24 a.m.

Sheppard Avenue West at Senlac Road

  • As per the ICCS, the traffic light was green for the SO. A westbound civilian vehicle moved from lane one to lane two as the SO approached from behind;
  • As per the AVL, the SO travelled at 93 km/h in the intersection.

Sheppard Avenue West at Brentwood Avenue/Easton Road 

  • As per the ICCS, the traffic light was green. No other vehicles were present;
  • As per the AVL, the SO travelled 101 km/h as he approached the intersection and 109 km/h just after the intersection.

Sheppard Avenue West at Earl Bales Park

  • As per the ICCS, westbound Sheppard Avenue West had a slight downgrade into the Earl Bales Park area. A posted speed limit sign was visible on the ICCS (not found on Google Maps Street View) of 50 km/h. On a long straight bridge (perhaps over a valley of some sort, or over Earl Bales Park itself), there were two westbound and two eastbound lanes and there was nothing on either side of the road. There was very little other traffic;
  • The AVL recorded the speed of the SO’s police vehicle as 101, 109, 117, 123, 123, 120, 115, and 99 km/h;
  • Sheppard Avenue West in this area appeared to be drier than on Yonge Street but still at least damp.

11:25 a.m.

Sheppard Avenue West at Bathurst Street

  • As per the ICCS, the SO moved to the left turn lane and approached a red light. As he slowed drastically and perhaps even stopped at the stop line, the light changed to green and the SO proceeded through the intersection;
  • As per the AVL, the SO slowed to at least 11 km/h.

Bryant Street/Yeomans Road 

  • As per the ICCS, the traffic light was green for the SO. Flashing emergency lights from WO #4’s police vehicle travelling westbound ahead of the SO were visible;
  • As per the AVL, the SO approached the intersection at 93 km/h and travelled at 99 km/h just after the intersection.

Sheppard Avenue West at Goddard Street

  • The traffic light was green and there were no other vehicles present;
  • As per the AVL, the SO travelled 109 km/h in the intersection.

Sheppard Avenue West at Wilmington Avenue/Faywood Boulevard•

  • As per the ICCS, the traffic light was green for the SO;
  • The flashing emergency lights from the police vehicles operated by WO #2 and WO #4 were visible ahead of the SO;
  • As per their ICCS, WO #2 and WO #4 had been travelling westbound on Sheppard Avenue West ahead of the SO;
  • As per the AVL, the SO travelled 96 km/h as he exited the intersection.

11:26 a.m.

Wilson Heights Boulevard 

  • The SO caught up to WO #2 and WO #4;
  • As per the ICCS, the traffic light was red;
  • WO #2 stopped in the centre of the intersection with his flashing emergency lights activated;
  • WO #4 stopped partially into the intersection behind WO #2, with his flashing emergency lights activated;
  • The first two police vehicles were essentially blocking the intersection. The SO slowed but did not stop prior to entering, and then passed uneventfully through the intersection in a “leap-frog” fashion with WO #2 and WO #4;
  • As per the AVL, the SO travelled 69 km/h as he approached, and 78 km/h after, the intersection;
  • WO #4 then crossed through the intersection and followed the SO;
  • WO #2 then followed WO #4.

Entrance/exit from Sheppard West station

  • As per the ICCS, the traffic light was green for the SO. A transit bus was stopped in the westbound curb lane and an SUV was stopped in the westbound passing lane. The eastbound traffic was stopped on the green light presumably because the drivers had seen the approaching police vehicles;
  • The SO entered the left turn lane and passed through the intersection;
  • As per the AVL, the SO travelled 88 km/h as he exited the intersection.

Sheppard Avenue West at Allen Road

  • As per the AVL, 250 metres east of the intersection of Sheppard Avenue West and Allen Road, the SO travelled 78 km/h;
  • As per the ICCS, the SO approached the traffic light-controlled intersection of Sheppard Avenue West and Allen Road in the passing lane. The traffic light was red for Sheppard Avenue West. There was no other traffic westbound, or eastbound. There were vehicles flowing northbound and southbound on Allen Road;
  • As per the ICCS of WO #4, as he approached the intersection, the SO came to a stop, or at least very close to a complete stop, in the area of the stop line and the crosswalk;
  • There was an older model vehicle, light in colour, in the intersection waiting to turn left from southbound to eastbound, and another vehicle waiting behind the older model vehicle. These vehicles would have created an obstruction of the traffic travelling southbound on Allen Road in the through lanes for the SO;
  • The ICCS in the SO’s police vehicle did not afford a view of the traffic travelling southbound on Allen Road save and except for the older model vehicle in the intersection waiting to turn left;
  • WO #4 approached the intersection behind the SO and straddled the two westbound through lanes with his flashing emergency lights and siren activated;
  • WO #2 approached behind WO #4 in the westbound passing lane with his flashing emergency lights and siren activated;
  • All three police vehicles had their flashing emergency lights and sirens activated;
  • As per the ICCS in the SO’s police vehicle, the siren changed sounds and the airhorn was being depressed;
  • The northbound traffic slowed as if to allow the SO to proceed into the intersection;
  • As viewed in the ICCS from WO #4, the SO released the brakes and entered the intersection;
  • Three or four seconds after the SO accelerated to cross the intersection, a male voice in the SO’s police vehicle [now known to be WO #1] said, “Watch. Watch”;
  • The investigator did not hear WO #1 say, “Go,” on the ICCS;
  • Four to five seconds after the SO released the brakes and entered the intersection, the SO pressed the brakes. The police vehicle appeared to be in about the middle of the intersection crossing over southbound through lane number one;
  • About one quarter of a second later, the SO’s police vehicle was struck on the passenger side by the southbound Tesla;
  • The SO’s police vehicle had entered the intersection about five seconds prior to the collision;
  • The Tesla entered the intersection about one half second prior to the collision;
  • As captured best in the ICCS of WO #2, the Tesla appeared to be travelling exceptionally faster than other traffic on Allen Road;
  • There was a violent impact with the front of the Tesla colliding with the passenger side of the SO’s police vehicle;
  • The SO’s police vehicle was forced sideways, lifted off the ground, bounced, and veered towards the southwest corner of the intersection;
  • The Tesla rotated clockwise and veered into the eastbound lanes near the eastbound stop line in front of a transit bus;

11:27 a.m.

  • As per the ICCS, the SO’s police vehicle came to rest facing southwest in the grass on the southwest corner of the intersection;
  • The final AVL data point considered for this analysis followed the second last data point by over one minute and showed the SO stopped on the southwest corner of the intersection.


Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Video


On April 23, 2020 at 2:19 p.m., the TTC provided the SIU with seven DVDs containing video recordings from TTC buses that were in the area of Sheppard Avenue West and the Allen Road during the time of the collision between the marked TPS SUV [now known to be driven the SO] and a Tesla [now known to be driven by the Complainant]. The following is a summary of the salient portions of the TTC bus video.

TTC Bus #1
  • At 11:20:06 a.m., the video commenced. TTC Bus #1 was in the area of Sheppard Avenue West and Northover Street;
  • At 11:26:25 a.m., TTC Bus #1 was travelling in the curb lane eastbound on Sheppard Avenue West approaching Allen Road. At the intersection, there were four lanes of travel eastbound on Sheppard Avenue West: a left turn lane, 2 through lanes, and a right turn lane;
  • At 11:26:29 a.m., the SO’s cruiser was travelling in lane #1 westbound on Sheppard Avenue West with its emergency lights activated. The SO’s cruiser stopped at the Allen Road intersection for approximately four seconds;
  • At 11:26:34 a.m., the SO’s cruiser proceeded westbound through the intersection on a red light. The vehicular traffic northbound on Allen Road had slowed and stopped. A southbound vehicle, possibly in the left turn or lane #1, had stopped after the designated crosswalk area;
  • At 11:26:36 a.m., the Complainant’s vehicle entered the intersection on a green light and collided with the passenger side of the SO’s cruiser. Upon impact, the rear of the SO’s cruiser lifted off the ground and then came to rest in the grass ditch in the southwest corner of the intersection. The Complainant’s vehicle came to rest in the curb lane of the eastbound lanes of Sheppard Avenue West. The vehicle’s airbags had deployed and there was significant front-end damage; and
  • At 11:26:38 a.m., a TPS cruiser [now known to be that of WO #3 and WO #4] stopped at the intersection in lane #2 and a TPS cruiser [now known to be driven by WO #2] in lane #1 appeared to be slowing to a stop at the time of the motor vehicle collision.

TTC Bus #2
  • At 11:20:16 a.m., TTC bus #2 was at the Sheppard-Yonge Bus Station;
  • At 11:24:33 a.m., a TPS cruiser [now known to be driven by WO #2] slowed and stopped at the intersection of Sheppard Avenue West and Bathurst Street in the left turn lane;
  • At 11:24:37 a.m., a TPS cruiser proceeded through the intersection on a red light;
  • At 11:24:48 a.m., a TPS cruiser [now known to be driven by WO #4] slowed at the Sheppard Avenue West and Bathurst Street intersection in the left turn lane for approximately 2 seconds;
  • At 11:24:50 a.m., a TPS cruiser proceeded through the intersection on a red light;
  • At 11:25:02 a.m., a TPS cruiser [now known to be driven by the SO] slowed at the intersection in the left turn lane for approximately 1 second;
  • At 11:25:03 a.m., a TPS cruiser proceeded through the intersection on a green light; and
  • At 11:30:31 a.m., bus #2 was in the area of Sheppard Avenue West and Allen Road in the curb lane at a red light.

TTC Bus #3
  • At 11:27:27 a.m., TTC bus #3 departed Sheppard-Yonge Bus Station and proceeded eastbound on Sheppard Avenue West;
  • At 11:33:16 a.m., TTC bus #3 was in the area of Wilson Heights Boulevard and Sheppard Avenue West; and
  • At 11:34:21 a.m., TTC bus #3 was in the area of Allen Road and Sheppard Avenue West.

TTC Bus #4
  • At 11:22:28 a.m., TTC bus #4 was in the area of Sheppard Avenue West and Allen Road in the curb lane proceeding eastbound; and
  • At 11:26:40 a.m., TTC bus #4 was in the area of Sheppard Avenue West and Robert Woodhead Crescent, approximately 3.1 kilometres west of the motor vehicle collision.

TTC Bus #5
  • At 11:20 a.m., TTC bus #5 was idle at the Sheppard Avenue West Subway Station (previously known as Downsview Subway Station); and
  • At 11:26:22 a.m., TTC bus #5 was in the area of Sheppard Avenue West and Kodiak Crescent, approximately 550 metres west of the motor vehicle collision.

TTC Bus #6
  • At 11:26:30 a.m., TTC bus #6 was in the area of Sheppard Avenue West and Chesswood Drive, approximately 1.3 kilometres west of the motor vehicle collision.

TTC Bus #7
  • At 11:29:38 a.m., TTC bus #7 was in the area of Sheppard Avenue West and Allen Road.

Materials obtained from Police Service

Upon request, the SIU obtained and reviewed the following materials and documents from the TPS and the TTC:
  •  Notes of the WOs and SO.
  • GPS / AVL data file;
  • ICCS recording for three TPS cruisers;
  • EDR report for the TPS Ford Explorer driven by the SO; and
  • EDR report for the Tesla driven by the Complainant.

Materials obtained from Other Sources

Upon request, the SIU obtained and reviewed the following materials from the TTC:
  • Video recorded by seven TTC buses, which had six interior cameras and five exterior cameras installed.

Incident Narrative

The material events in question are clear on the evidence collected by the SIU, which included interviews with the SO and video recordings of the incident captured by a camera on a TTC bus and the ICCSs of police cruisers. In the morning of April 13, 2020, police officers were dispatched in response to a report of a person with a knife in the area of the Downsview Park subway station. The SO, with his partner, WO #1, were among the officers making their way to the scene, traveling together in a marked SUV.

Proceeding west on Sheppard Avenue West, the SO came to a stop at the red light at the Allen Road intersection. The officer briefly waited before making his way into the intersection on the red light. The cruiser had just cleared the northbound lanes of Allen Road and the first couple of lanes of southbound traffic when it was broadsided by a Tesla proceeding south through the intersection in the furthest west through lane of Allen Road.

The Tesla was being operated by the Complainant. He was travelling at upwards of 100 km/h when his vehicle entered the intersection and T-boned the police SUV.

The collision propelled the police SUV in a southwest direction where it came to rest in a grassy ditch at the corner of the intersection. The Tesla was sent spinning clockwise and came to a rest in the eastbound lanes of Sheppard Avenue West facing east. Both vehicles sustained heavy damage.

Paramedics and firefighters arrived at the scene and the parties involved in the collision were taken to hospital. The Complainant was diagnosed with multiple fractures. The SO suffered a concussion and some bruising.

Relevant Legislation

Section 320.13, Criminal Code – Dangerous causing bodily harm

320.13 (1) Everyone commits an offence who operates a conveyance in a manner that, having regard to all of the circumstances, is dangerous to the public.

(2) Everyone commits an offence who operates a conveyance in a manner that, having regard to all of the circumstances, is dangerous to the public and, as a result, causes bodily harm to another person.


Analysis and Director's Decision

On April 13, 2020, the Complainant suffered a variety of fractures in a collision with a TPS cruiser. The driver of the cruiser, the SO, was identified as the subject officer for purposes of the SIU investigation. On my assessment of the evidence, there are no reasonable grounds to believe that the SO committed a criminal offence in connection with the collision.

The offence that arises for consideration is dangerous driving causing bodily harm contrary to section 320.13(2) of the Criminal Code. Liability for the offence is predicated, in part, on conduct that amounts to a marked departure from the level of care that a reasonable person would have exercised in the circumstances. In the instant case, the issue is whether there was any want of care in the manner in which the SO entered the intersection that caused or contributed to the collision and was sufficiently derelict as to attract criminal sanction. In my view, there was not.

At the outset, it should be noted that the SO was engaged in the lawful execution of his duties as he travelled west on Sheppard Avenue toward the scene at which a person had been reported with a knife.

The video evidence indicates that the officer operated his cruiser with due care and regard for the traveling public around him as he made his way westward on Sheppard Avenue West from Yonge Street. While his speeds were at times north of 100 km/h, it does not appear that other motorists were at any point adversely impacted by the operation of the SO’s cruiser. The same can be said of the officer’s travel through intersections. Though most of these occurred on green lights, there were a couple of occasions in which it appears the SO slowed but did not stop before entering the intersection. While the officer ought to have brought his vehicle to a complete stop on these occasions pursuant to the Highway Traffic Act, the evidence establishes that other motorists were at no point imperiled by the SO’s conduct in this regard. Once at Allen Road, the evidence indicates that the SO brought his cruiser to a stop and only entered the intersection after northbound and southbound traffic in the vicinity had come to a stop. Regrettably, neither the SO nor his passenger, WO #1, saw the Complainant’s Tesla accelerating toward the intersection at speeds in excess of 100 km/h until just before impact. While it may be that the SO ought to have taken greater precaution to ensure that the far west through lane of Allen Road was clear before he accelerated into its path, it would appear that the Complainant’s excessive speed played a role in the officer’s misjudgment. Be that as it may, the SO’s indiscretion, if it be such, amounted to a momentary lapse of attention in a course of conduct that was otherwise duly diligent.

On the aforementioned record, I am unable to reasonably conclude that the SO transgressed the limits of care prescribed by the criminal law notwithstanding the collision in which he had a part. Accordingly, there is no basis for proceeding with criminal charges in this case and the file is closed.


Date: February 18, 2021


Electronically approved by

Joseph Martino
Director
Special Investigations Unit

Note:

The signed English original report is authoritative, and any discrepancy between that report and the French and English online versions should be resolved in favour of the original English report.